J's Footy Alerts

Shrewsbury v Exeter City

League Two · England · Saturday 10 October 2026, 15:00 BST
Referee: not yet assigned. Every figure below is a record of what happened in these clubs' last 10 matches in this division - counted, not forecast. Each percentage carries the number of matches it was taken over, and anything with fewer than 5 is shown as a count instead.
Last updated 05 October 2026, 23:55 BST.

What the model makes of it

No projection for this one. One of these sides has played fewer than 8 games in this division, so its form was earned against a different standard of opposition and the model would read it wrong.

8.6Corners projected

Main markets overview

Each side's own average a game in this division, last 10 for Shrewsbury and 9 for Exeter City. The bar splits at the centre line; the longer side is whichever team averages more of that statistic, not whichever result would be better for them.

Corners 5.3
4.78
Shots 13.4
11.11
Shots on target 3.9
3.56
Fouls 14.9
11.67
Yellow cards 2.9
1.67
Offsides 2.2
2.71
Possession % 43.3
44.33
Shrewsbury Exeter City

Recent form

Shrewsbury at home
Last 10 in this league
  • Played10
  • W / D / L3 / 2 / 5
  • Points per game1.1
  • Goals scored a game0.9
  • Goals conceded a game1.5
Last 4 at home
  • Played4
  • W / D / L2 / 1 / 1
  • Points per game1.75
  • Goals scored a game1.5
  • Goals conceded a game1.25
How often, last 10
  • Both teams scored40% (4 of 10)
  • Clean sheet20% (2 of 10)
  • Failed to score40% (4 of 10)
  • Over 1.5 match goals80% (8 of 10)
  • Over 2.5 match goals40% (4 of 10)
  • Over 3.5 match goals20% (2 of 10)
  • Over 8.5 match corners40% (4 of 10)
  • Over 9.5 match corners40% (4 of 10)
  • Over 3.5 match cards50% (5 of 10)
  • Over 4.5 match cards50% (5 of 10)
  • Over 24.5 match shots40% (4 of 10)
  • Over 26.5 match shots30% (3 of 10)
  • Over 7.5 match shots on target50% (5 of 10)
  • Over 8.5 match shots on target50% (5 of 10)
  • Over 3.5 match offsides50% (5 of 10)
  • Over 4.5 match offsides40% (4 of 10)
Results, newest first
  • W 2026-10-03 · at Grimsby 2-1
  • D 2026-09-26 · v Colchester 2-2
  • D 2026-09-19 · at Crewe 1-1
  • W 2026-09-12 · v Northampton 2-0
  • L 2026-09-05 · at Fleetwood Town 0-2
  • L 2026-09-01 · at Rochdale 0-3
  • W 2026-08-29 · v Salford City 1-0
  • L 2026-08-22 · v Barnet 1-3
  • L 2026-08-15 · at Tranmere 0-2
  • L 2026-05-02 · at Gillingham 0-1
Exeter City away
Last 9 in this league
  • Played9
  • W / D / L2 / 3 / 4
  • Points per game1.0
  • Goals scored a game0.56
  • Goals conceded a game0.67
Last 4 away
  • Played4
  • W / D / L0 / 0 / 4
  • Points per game0.0
  • Goals scored a game0.25
  • Goals conceded a game1.25
How often, last 9
  • Both teams scored22% (2 of 9)
  • Clean sheet44% (4 of 9)
  • Failed to score56% (5 of 9)
  • Over 1.5 match goals33% (3 of 9)
  • Over 2.5 match goals11% (1 of 9)
  • Over 3.5 match goals0% (0 of 9)
  • Over 8.5 match corners78% (7 of 9)
  • Over 9.5 match corners56% (5 of 9)
  • Over 3.5 match cards56% (5 of 9)
  • Over 4.5 match cards56% (5 of 9)
  • Over 24.5 match shots33% (3 of 9)
  • Over 26.5 match shots22% (2 of 9)
  • Over 7.5 match shots on target33% (3 of 9)
  • Over 8.5 match shots on target33% (3 of 9)
  • Over 3.5 match offsides57% (4 of 7)
  • Over 4.5 match offsides43% (3 of 7)
Results, newest first
  • W 2026-10-03 · v Rotherham 1-0
  • L 2026-09-26 · at Bristol Rovers 0-1
  • D 2026-09-19 · v Tranmere 0-0
  • L 2026-09-12 · at Port Vale 0-1
  • D 2026-09-05 · v Walsall 0-0
  • D 2026-09-01 · v Barnet 1-1
  • L 2026-08-29 · at York 1-2
  • W 2026-08-22 · v Accrington ST 2-0
  • L 2026-08-15 · at Grimsby 0-1

Head to head

100%
0 Shrewsbury 0% 0 drawn 0% 2 Exeter City 100%

Every competition, including cups - so a tie here may have been played under very different circumstances from a league match. The colour on each share above is relative to what an EVEN record between these two sides would look like (a third each) - not the fixed high/mid/low cut-offs used on a form rate elsewhere on this page - because a head-to-head has no league average to be measured against. The W/D/L mark on each meeting is from Shrewsbury's side, whichever club was actually at home that day.

Squads this season

Shrewsbury
PlayerAppsGoalsAssistsYel
George Lloyd F 9 2 0 2
K. M. Brown M 5 2 0 2
William Boyle D 9 1 2 2
Isaac Fletcher M 9 1 0 1
Kevin Berkoe M 9 1 0 2
Luca Hoole M 9 1 0 2
Josh Davison F 8 1 0 3
Thomas Sang M 9 0 1 1
William Michael Brook G 9 0 0 0
Jay Turner-Cooke M 8 0 0 2
Joe Gbode F 6 0 0 2
Josh Ruffels D 6 0 0 1
Sam Stubbs D 6 0 0 1
will gray 6 0 0 2
Arkelle Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd M 5 0 0 0
M. Golding M 4 0 0 0
Tom Anderson D 3 0 0 2
Will Gray M 3 0 0 0
Isaac Lee D 2 0 0 1
L. Sousa D 2 0 0 0
Hugo Aiston F 1 0 0 0
Isaac England D 1 0 0 1
Exeter City
PlayerAppsGoalsAssistsYel
Jack Fitzwater D 9 2 0 1
Reece Cole M 8 1 0 1
A. Scully M 1 1 0 0
Gwion Edwards M 9 0 1 2
Luca Woodhouse D 7 0 1 1
Andrew Oluwabori M 5 0 1 0
George Birch M 5 0 1 0
Charlie Cummins M 9 0 0 2
Jack Bycroft G 9 0 0 0
Josh Gordon M 9 0 0 2
Jake Doyle-Hayes M 8 0 0 2
Lakyle Samuel M 8 0 0 0
Taylor Perry M 8 0 0 1
Edward James D 7 0 0 1
Ethan Sutherland M 7 0 0 0
Vincent Harper M 6 0 0 1
Sonny Cox F 5 0 0 0
D. Rose F 4 0 0 0
J. Taylor D 4 0 0 0
George Birch M 3 0 0 0
Jayden Wareham F 2 0 0 1
Liam Oakes D 2 0 0 0
Ajay Matthews F 1 0 0 0
J. Taylor D 1 0 0 0

These are counts, not forecasts. Everything outside the model block is a description of matches that have already been played: "over 2.5 goals, 7 of 10" means seven of this side's last ten in this division finished with three or more, and it is not a statement about this one. A rate over fewer than 5 matches is printed as a count with no percentage, because a handful of matches is fully described by naming them. Form is scoped to this division deliberately - a side promoted or relegated in the summer earned its earlier record against a different standard of opposition - so a newly promoted club shows fewer matches rather than a longer record from somewhere else. Head to head is the one section that reads every competition. A statistic the data source does not report is shown as "not reported" rather than as zero; expected goals in particular is carried in the top divisions and largely absent below the second tier, so it is withheld there rather than averaged over the third of matches that have it. Model percentages are measured walk-forward against a base rate and not against a bookmaker's price. Not betting advice.