League Two · England
· Saturday 10 October 2026, 15:00 BST
Referee: not yet assigned.
Every figure below is a record of what happened in these clubs'
last 10 matches in this division - counted, not forecast.
Each percentage carries the number of matches it was taken over, and anything
with fewer than 5 is shown as a count instead.
Last updated 05 October 2026, 23:55 BST.
What the model makes of it
35%Cheltenham
24%Draw
42%Salford City
55%Over 2.5
45%Under 2.5
84%Home corners under 7.5this league 77%
74%Draw or away win at half timethis league 66%
2.87Goals projected
7.8Corners projected
Main markets overview
Each side's own average a game in this division, last
10 for Cheltenham and
10 for Salford City. The bar splits at
the centre line; the longer side is whichever team averages more of that
statistic, not whichever result would be better for them.
Corners4.6
6.4
Shots10.0
14.6
Shots on target3.7
3.9
Fouls11.5
10.9
Yellow cards2.1
1.3
Offsides2.22
2.3
Possession %45.2
56.8
Cheltenham Salford City
Recent form
Cheltenhamat home
Last 10 in this league
Played10
W / D / L4 / 3 / 3
Points per game1.5
Goals scored a game1.7
Goals conceded a game1.8
Last 5 at home
Played5
W / D / L3 / 1 / 1
Points per game2.0
Goals scored a game2.0
Goals conceded a game2.0
How often, last 10
Both teams scored90%(9 of 10)
Clean sheet0%(0 of 10)
Failed to score10%(1 of 10)
Over 1.5 match goals100%(10 of 10)
Over 2.5 match goals80%(8 of 10)
Over 3.5 match goals50%(5 of 10)
Over 8.5 match corners80%(8 of 10)
Over 9.5 match corners70%(7 of 10)
Over 3.5 match cards60%(6 of 10)
Over 4.5 match cards20%(2 of 10)
Over 24.5 match shots60%(6 of 10)
Over 26.5 match shots50%(5 of 10)
Over 7.5 match shots on target80%(8 of 10)
Over 8.5 match shots on target60%(6 of 10)
Over 3.5 match offsides22%(2 of 9)
Over 4.5 match offsides22%(2 of 9)
Results, newest first
L
2026-10-03 · at Accrington ST
0-2
W
2026-09-26 · v Chesterfield
2-1
D
2026-09-19 · at Colchester
1-1
W
2026-09-12 · at Crawley Town
3-1
D
2026-09-05 · v Grimsby
2-2
W
2026-09-01 · v York
3-2
D
2026-08-29 · at Barnet
2-2
L
2026-08-22 · at Swindon Town
1-2
W
2026-08-15 · v Rotherham
2-1
L
2026-05-02 · v Colchester
1-4
Salford Cityaway
Last 10 in this league
Played10
W / D / L5 / 1 / 4
Points per game1.6
Goals scored a game1.3
Goals conceded a game1.3
Last 5 away
Played5
W / D / L1 / 1 / 3
Points per game0.8
Goals scored a game1.6
Goals conceded a game2.2
How often, last 10
Both teams scored40%(4 of 10)
Clean sheet30%(3 of 10)
Failed to score30%(3 of 10)
Over 1.5 match goals50%(5 of 10)
Over 2.5 match goals50%(5 of 10)
Over 3.5 match goals30%(3 of 10)
Over 8.5 match corners60%(6 of 10)
Over 9.5 match corners60%(6 of 10)
Over 3.5 match cards50%(5 of 10)
Over 4.5 match cards20%(2 of 10)
Over 24.5 match shots60%(6 of 10)
Over 26.5 match shots50%(5 of 10)
Over 7.5 match shots on target40%(4 of 10)
Over 8.5 match shots on target40%(4 of 10)
Over 3.5 match offsides60%(6 of 10)
Over 4.5 match offsides40%(4 of 10)
Results, newest first
W
2026-10-03 · v Fleetwood Town
1-0
W
2026-09-26 · at Oldham
4-1
W
2026-09-19 · v Swindon Town
1-0
D
2026-09-12 · at Rotherham
3-3
W
2026-09-05 · v Port Vale
1-0
W
2026-09-01 · v Newport County
2-1
L
2026-08-29 · at Shrewsbury
0-1
L
2026-08-22 · v Chesterfield
0-1
L
2026-08-15 · at Barnet
1-3
L
2026-05-25 · at Notts County
0-3
Head to head
40%20%40%
2 Cheltenham 40%1 drawn 20%2 Salford City 40%
Last 5 meetings, goals a game3.0
W2026-02-21 · League Two ·
Cheltenham v Salford City3-2
D2025-08-29 · League Two ·
Salford City v Cheltenham1-1
W2025-01-25 · League Two ·
Cheltenham v Salford City2-1
L2024-11-30 · FA Cup ·
Salford City v Cheltenham2-0
L2024-09-14 · League Two ·
Salford City v Cheltenham2-1
Every competition, including cups - so a tie here may have been played under
very different circumstances from a league match. The colour on each share above
is relative to what an EVEN record between these two sides would look like
(a third each) - not the fixed high/mid/low cut-offs used on a form rate
elsewhere on this page - because a head-to-head has no league average to be
measured against. The W/D/L mark on each meeting is from Cheltenham's
side, whichever club was actually at home that day.
Squads this season
Cheltenham
Player
Apps
Goals
Assists
Yel
Charlie McCann
M
9
7
0
1
Andreas Weimann
F
9
4
2
2
Jake Evans
M
9
3
2
2
Ryan Broom
M
7
2
2
0
Jonathan Tomkinson
D
9
0
1
4
Jordan Shipley
M
9
0
1
2
Robbie Cundy
D
9
0
1
0
Pierce Sweeney
D
8
0
1
2
Ben Stevenson
M
9
0
0
0
Joseph Tomlinson
M
9
0
0
0
Wyll Stanway
G
9
0
0
0
Freddie Willcox
M
8
0
0
2
Kirsten Otchere
F
8
0
0
0
Jake Bickerstaff
F
7
0
0
1
Shaun McWilliams
M
6
0
0
4
George Nurse
D
5
0
0
0
James Wilson
D
5
0
0
0
G. Miller
F
2
0
0
0
Salford City
Player
Apps
Goals
Assists
Yel
Joe Powell
M
8
3
2
1
Kelly N'Mai
M
9
2
1
0
Adebola Oluwo
D
9
2
0
0
Macaulay Langstaff
F
9
2
0
2
Luke Molyneux
M
8
1
3
1
Ryan Graydon
F
5
1
1
1
Brendan Sarpong-Wiredu
M
8
1
0
2
Taylor Allen
D
7
1
0
0
Kallum Cesay
M
6
0
2
1
Luke Garbutt
D
4
0
1
1
Jorge Grant
M
9
0
0
0
Will Norris
G
9
0
0
0
Daniel Udoh
F
8
0
0
0
Will Aimson
D
8
0
0
0
Abraham Odoh
M
7
0
0
1
Ben Woodburn
M
5
0
0
0
Elliot Bonds
M
5
0
0
0
Ollie Turton
D
5
0
0
1
D. Scarr
D
4
0
0
0
Matt Butcher
M
3
0
0
0
Kyrell Malcolm
M
2
0
0
0
Nathan Asiimwe
D
2
0
0
0
Hayden Carson
D
1
0
0
0
Zach Awe
D
1
0
0
0
These are counts, not forecasts. Everything outside the model block
is a description of matches that have already been played: "over 2.5 goals, 7 of 10"
means seven of this side's last ten in this division finished with three or more, and
it is not a statement about this one. A rate over fewer than
5 matches is printed as a count with no percentage,
because a handful of matches is fully described by naming them.
Form is scoped to this division deliberately - a side promoted or relegated
in the summer earned its earlier record against a different standard of opposition -
so a newly promoted club shows fewer matches rather than a longer record from
somewhere else. Head to head is the one section that reads every competition.
A statistic the data source does not report is shown as "not reported" rather than as
zero; expected goals in particular is carried in the top divisions and largely absent
below the second tier, so it is withheld there rather than averaged over the third of
matches that have it. Model percentages are measured walk-forward against a base rate
and not against a bookmaker's price. Not betting advice.